It's been several months since I wrote my lengthy piece on the John Titor story. I still get several comments to it a month, especially leading up to the election.
Now that it's been a week and no civil war has broken out, and only the most fringe elements of the left wing still dispute the outcome of the election, do you think we can officially declare the John Titor tale a hoax? Without this lynchpin, the story falls apart completely. If there is no 'civil unrest' over a 'disputed election in 2004', then there is no civil war. No civil war, no nuclear war. No nuclear war, no need to return to the past for some near-ancient IBM PC to solve some otherwise-unsolvable problem.
What does everyone think? Can we safely stick a fork in it? Do you think The Artist Formerly Known As John Titor will come forward and confess now that the hoax is out?
November 10 2004, 02:06:51 UTC 7 years ago
November 10 2004, 02:17:25 UTC 7 years ago
Seriously: no reliable source has -any- level of voting irregularities that would affect the election in either direction. Even the foreign observers allowed in to view things had no real complaints.
Titor painted a picture of widespread civil unrest following a violently disputed election. Clearly, the author was counting on a repeat of 2000 but with more polarized views and more widespread problems. That just didn't happen, and the closest we came to civil unrest was a bunch of anarchists in San Francisco trying to attack a McDonalds on election night.
November 10 2004, 10:31:39 UTC 7 years ago
November 10 2004, 16:28:08 UTC 7 years ago
November 10 2004, 17:06:35 UTC 7 years ago
http://www.drudgereport.com/flashmn.h
November 10 2004, 02:18:54 UTC 7 years ago
November 10 2004, 02:26:17 UTC 7 years ago
http://www.livejournal.com/community/ho
There ya go.
November 10 2004, 02:31:23 UTC 7 years ago
*toddles off to go read it*
November 10 2004, 10:01:47 UTC 7 years ago
November 10 2004, 07:11:18 UTC 7 years ago
I was just searching for Titor because of a comment
http://www.livejournal.com/community/loNovember 10 2004, 10:02:25 UTC 7 years ago
November 10 2004, 11:28:57 UTC 7 years ago
November 11 2004, 00:48:52 UTC 7 years ago
The issue here really isn't a militia-stock hoax.
I agree.Bush's landslide victory of three percentage points is clearly a mandate from the American people that they have at last united.
Move along.
Do you have any idea what the dollar is poised to do in the next three years?
November 11 2004, 02:04:15 UTC 7 years ago
Re: The issue here really isn't a militia-stock hoax.
I didn't say any of that, and neither did Titor.He specifically stated that the 'civil unrest' that began the civil war in 2005 was started after a disputed election in 2004.
Well, we just had the last major election of 2004 and it is not widely disputed. The only people disputing it are on the absolute fringe of the left-wing, and that's a group that has previously shown neither the will to be well organized nor engage in co-ordinated violence.
Regardless of whether or not you feel that President Bush has a legitimate mandate, I don't see you running out, buying a shotgun, and taking potshots at government assets. That kind of thing is what it would take to start the sort of mass civil unrest needed to eventually grow into a civil war.
Deleted comment
January 12 2005, 01:54:04 UTC 7 years ago
February 28 2005, 23:28:14 UTC 7 years ago
To me, the most telling piece of evidence as to Titor's falsity is that he chose such crackpot forums to present his claims. Had he posted on a university's boards frequented by physics professors, I'd take a different tack, but Titor chose those whose gullibility is only exacerbated by their readiness to accept anything with a ring of authenticity. Titor knew that the Art Bell crowd would gobble his stuff up. These people also seriously entertain alien visits, vampires, men in black, reverse speech, etc. Titor chose his audience carefully.
Your comment about cold reading psychics is right on the mark. Look at what is missing from all Titor's "evidence": a photograph of his face, a photo of his insignia, the GE logo, a scan of any verbiage that would give greater detail as to the workings of his device, close-up photos of the device. He's a classic huckster. There's just enough information to whet the appetite, but nothing specific. The majority of the world can tell you the date of the Trade Center attacks, but Titor doesn't supply even a month for the start of a major war. Go figure. The details only come when Titor addresses events prior to his posts, like the computer, for example.
I love the car mounted time machine device! I think Titor was winking at the Back to the Future movies with this one. He even put it in an exotic car at first (a Corvette). At least he didn't call it a flux capacitor and mention an optimal speed of 88MPH.
Also, one would think digital photography would be the norm in 2036. Titor's photos look to be scanned film pictures. While I doubt film is on the scrap heap in 2036, certainly the more efficient method of taking pictures would be with a digital camera. If post-war GE can build an efficient time machine, you'd think they'd be cranking out digital cameras, too.
This guy is nothing more than a poor man's Nostradamus (another huckster). I predict we'll all be doing fine this time next year, and I'm no time traveller.
March 1 2005, 02:09:55 UTC 7 years ago
Also, he said the cities were destroyed, but the capital of the US was moved to Omaha, a city that boasts a population of 700,000+ in its metro area. It's also the headquarters for the SAC and has always been considered a prime military target. Did the Russians just spare Omaha?
The more I read it, the more ridiculous it appears to me. The Art Bell crowd will buy anything, it seems.
March 5 2005, 03:44:19 UTC 7 years ago
March 5 2005, 04:04:21 UTC 7 years ago
Frankly, it's March 2005 and here we sit in the nice, calm, civil-unrestless United States, so it's safe to say he was full of poo.